Current panel name: SalmoDArTag3K BI CU Repooled (2.0)

Panel name for soft release: Salmon_DArTag_BI_Cornell_University (2.0)

Version description: (1.0) original (2.0) as original but without mitochondrial markers

Availability: Yes

A person is holding a North American Atlantic Salmon above the rushing water.

Description: DArTag Salmon panel version 2 for 2979 marker loci developed by Breeding Insight at Cornell University, in collaboration with DArT and funded by USDA-ARS for public use. DArTag assay uses custom designed oligos to amplify targeted SNPs, and their flanking sequences, prior to Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). The sequenced amplicons are demultiplexed and targeted SNPs/haplotypes are analyzed using DArT P/L’s proprietary pipeline.

The marker loci were selected from a diverse set of 80 North American Atlantic salmon fish from the USDA NCWMAC breeding program. The panel is suitable for genotyping NA Atlantic salmon for breeding decisions and selection.  Usage of the panel outside of Salmo salar has not been tested and could result in higher missing data and fewer data points. Access to the panel can be found on DArT’s website (

Results and Data Sharing: DArT offers multiple data output formats. Users are encouraged to work with DArT to ensure the data type they desire is provided. Users are also strongly encouraged to request the Missing Allele Discovery Counts (MADC) file from DArT when placing orders. This file contains the read counts of each 81-bp michrohaplotype detected in each sample and at each locus. Breeding Insight requests that the MADC file and sample metadata also be sent to to be added to the public microhaplotype database for fixed allele naming and public data sharing. Proprietary sample metadata can be privatized in the database for IP protection.

Citation:  In preparation

**Disclaimer: These materials are based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement numbers [8062-21000-043-004-A8062-21000-052-002-A, and 8062-21000-052-003-A). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In addition, any reference to specific brands or types of products or services does not constitute or imply an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for those products or services.**